You are here:-, Sleeping Bag-Klymit Static V vs V2

Klymit Static V vs V2

Is the New Klymit Sleeping Pad Worth the Upgrade?

Klymit is a relatively new outdoor gear company that's been producing some very high quality products at low prices.  Their gear is focused on entry level backpackers who are looking for a nice balance between weight and price.

The Klymit Static V and Klymit Static V2 are their two most popular sleeping pads.  They're both good sleeping pads but if you're trying to decide the two of them it can be tricky as they're very similar.  This guide will break down the pros and cons of each model and help you decide which one is right for your needs.

Klymit Static V2

Klymit Static V and V2 Specifications

Klymit Static V and V2 Spec Comparison

Static V

Static V2

Fabric

75D Polyester

30D Polyester Top

75D Polyester Bottom

Weight

18.7 oz

16.6 oz

R Value

1.3

1.3

Packed Size

3" x 8"

3" x 8"

Dimensions

72" x 23" x 2.5"

72" x 23" x 2.5"

Cost

$$

$$

User Ratings

Check Lowest Prices

The Only Difference is Weight

Most of the specifications on the two sleeping pads are identical.  The only difference is the weight which is a result of the material choices Klymit made.  The Klymit Static V is made entirely of 75D polyester but the V2 is made with 30D polyester on the top and 75D polyester on the bottom.

The 75D is thicker which is better for protecting the sleeping pad from punctures, but is unnecessary on the top of the sleeping pad where it's not as prone to damage.  By cutting the material down to 30D, Klymit was able to reduce the weight of the pad by about 10%.

Due to the increased complexity of manufacturing with two different materials, the Klymit Static V2 costs $5 more than the Static V.  It's up to you if the 2 oz weight difference is worth an additional $5 but personally I'd spend the extra 5 bucks since this is a sleeping pad you'll be able to use for a long time.  As far as backpacking gear goes, a $5 difference is pretty small and anytime you can reduce your weight without sacrificing function it's worth it.

Things We Don't Like About the V2

There are just two things we don't like about the Static V and V2.  The first is the R value and the second is the lack of size options.

The R value is a way to compare the insulating properties of different pads.  A lower R value means it is less insulating and a higher R value means it is more insulating.

Both of these Klymit sleeping pads have an R value of 1.3 which is very low.  Because the R value is so low, this pad should only be used for 3 season backpacking.  I would never use this pad in the winter without putting an additional pad underneath it.  If you're looking for a sleeping pad that you can also use during the winter I'd recommend something with at least an R value of 4.0.

The other disappointment with the Klymit Static V and V2 is that it only comes in one size option which is 72" long.  As someone who is 73" tall, this is a deal breaker!  Most other companies offer their sleeping pads in multiple sizes, usually ranging from 72" up to 78" which will work for most people.  

If you are tall or do any winter backpacking you'll need to find a different sleeping pad.  For the rest of us, this pad is a great option as an entry level pad that is lightweight and extremely affordable.

Klymit Static V2 Review Summary

Pros

  • Light weight sleeping pad.
  • High quality for the price.
  • Thick material on the bottom of the pad protects against punctures.

Cons

  • Low R value makes it unsuitable for winter backpacking.
  • Not offered in different sizes.

The Klymit Static V2 is a great entry level sleeping pad.  It weighs just 1 pound and packs down tot he size of a pop can.  The only downside is the low R value which means it is only suitable for spring/summer/fall camping.  If you're looking for a pad to use during the winter then you'll want something with at least a 4 or 5 R value.

By | 2018-02-07T05:01:30+00:00 February 1st, 2018|Categories: Reviews, Sleeping Bag|Tags: |0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment